ISTANBUL—In a dramatic and highly controversial move, Israel’s Finance Minister, Bezalel Smotrich, has publicly advocated for the annexation of a significant portion of the occupied West Bank, reigniting tensions in the already volatile Middle East. Speaking at a press conference on Wednesday, Smotrich held up a map of the region and declared that "Israeli sovereignty should be applied to approximately 82% of the territory." The bold proposal, made by a key member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s far-right coalition, has been met with swift and furious backlash from Arab states and international bodies, who view it as a grave threat to regional stability and the prospect of a two-state solution.
Smotrich, a figure long associated with Israel’s nationalist and religious right, justified his demand by invoking what he described as Israel’s "biblical, historical, and moral right to our entire land." He revealed that his plan had been under review by the Higher Planning Committee of the Civil Administration, a body under the control of his Ministry of Defense portfolio, and called on Prime Minister Netanyahu to make a "historic decision to apply Israeli sovereignty to all open areas of 'Judea and Samaria.'" The term "Judea and Samaria" is the biblical name for the region and is widely used by Israeli nationalists to refer to the West Bank, underscoring the ideological underpinnings of his proposal.
The minister’s recent actions have been consistent with his expansionist vision. Last month, he gave final approval for a plan to construct approximately 7,000 new settlement units in the E1 area and other parts of the West Bank, a move that drew widespread international criticism. The international community largely considers these settlements illegal under international law and a major obstacle to peace, as they fragment Palestinian territory and undermine the viability of a future Palestinian state.
The immediate reaction to Smotrich’s latest pronouncement was one of alarm and condemnation from across the Arab world. The Secretary-General of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi, issued a statement condemning the "dangerous and suspicious demands" in the strongest possible terms. "This inflammatory demand demonstrates Israel’s approach to destabilizing regional security," Albudaiwi stated, urging the international community to take "immediate action to halt this act." The GCC, which includes Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, represents a significant bloc of Arab nations, and their collective voice carries considerable weight.
The United Arab Emirates, in particular, voiced its concern, with Special Envoy Lana Nusseibeh warning that the annexation of the West Bank would be a "red line." In an interview with Reuters, Nusseibeh emphasized that such a move would "severely undermine the vision and spirit of the Abraham Accords and end the pursuit of regional integration." The Abraham Accords, a series of normalization agreements brokered in 2020 between Israel and several Arab nations, including the UAE and Bahrain, were hailed as a breakthrough for regional peace. Smotrich’s proposal, however, threatens to unravel these diplomatic gains and could plunge the region back into a state of heightened conflict and diplomatic isolation. Nusseibeh also stressed that "extremists should not be allowed to dictate the direction of the Middle East," a clear rebuke to the influence of far-right figures within the Israeli government.
The West Bank was originally Jordanian territory until it was captured by Israel in the 1967 Six-Day War. Since then, it has been under Israeli military occupation, with a growing number of Jewish settlements established in the territory. While a small portion of the West Bank is under full Palestinian Authority control, Israel maintains varying degrees of military and civil control over the rest. The international consensus has long been that the West Bank should form the core of a future Palestinian state, with the final borders negotiated as part of a comprehensive peace agreement. Smotrich's annexation plan directly challenges this long-held principle, suggesting that a peaceful, negotiated settlement is becoming increasingly remote.
The proposal also poses a significant challenge to the already strained relationship between the Israeli government and its international partners, including the United States. While the U.S. has maintained a close alliance with Israel, it has also repeatedly stated its commitment to a two-state solution and has opposed unilateral actions that prejudice the outcome of final status negotiations. Smotrich's plan for de facto annexation, if pursued, could create a major diplomatic rift and potentially lead to sanctions or other punitive measures from the international community. The coming days will be critical as the world watches to see how Prime Minister Netanyahu and his government respond to the global backlash and whether they intend to seriously pursue a policy that could have catastrophic consequences for peace in the Middle East. The controversy serves as a stark reminder of the deep ideological divisions within Israeli society and the enormous hurdles that remain on the path to a lasting peace.
[Copyright (c) Global Economic Times. All Rights Reserved.]
