Qatar Airways (QR) has reportedly fired a crew member in connection with a theft incident that occurred on a business class flight from Doha Hamad International Airport (DOH) to Singapore Changi Airport (SIN). The victim, a passenger who had their mobile phone stolen after briefly leaving it in the lavatory, claims that Qatar Airways' compensation offer is insufficient and has filed a formal complaint with aviation authorities.
The incident, which occurred on March 28, 2025, involved a business class passenger who left their mobile phone unattended in the lavatory shortly before arrival in Singapore. Upon returning, the phone was missing. Tracking technology later revealed the phone was at a crew hotel in Singapore before being moved to the Philippines.
Qatar Airways' internal investigation confirmed the theft, leading to the dismissal of the involved crew member. However, the victim alleges that Qatar Airways' customer service response was delayed and inconsistent, and that the airline has failed to adequately compensate for the wider impact of the theft.
The passenger stated that Qatar Airways took weeks to respond to inquiries, eventually offering only 949 Singapore dollars (approximately £560) – the cost of a replacement phone – as compensation. Furthermore, the airline allegedly attempted to downplay the theft as a simple case of "misplaced personal belongings," disregarding its own investigation findings.
Feeling dissatisfied, the affected passenger has filed formal complaints with both the Qatar Civil Aviation Authority and the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS). These complaints address not only the theft itself but also the subsequent failures in customer service.
The passenger, a long-time customer of Singapore Airlines (SQ), expressed disappointment with Qatar Airways' handling of the serious security breach by one of its staff members. They claimed that despite contacting the CEO's office and senior management, a satisfactory resolution has not been reached.
Legal experts suggest that airlines can be held liable for the actions of their employees, particularly in cases involving the theft of passenger property. This incident raises questions about Qatar Airways' security protocols, employee vetting procedures, and its approach to compensating customers for staff-related misconduct during flights.
This incident follows a recent lawsuit against Qatar Airways by a passenger who claimed that $600 was stolen from their designer handbag while they slept in a QSuite business class seat. That incident allegedly occurred on February 26, 2025, on flight QR738 from San Francisco to Doha.
According to the lawsuit filed in California, the passenger boarded with $4,100 in cash. Upon waking, their handbag was missing but was later found on the lavatory floor with a Qatar Airways flight attendant. An inventory of their belongings revealed that $600 was missing from an envelope containing the dollar bills.
The unnamed passenger claimed that they immediately alerted a senior flight attendant to the theft, but no immediate action was taken, and the accused crew member continued to work the remaining 15 hours of the flight.
The lawsuit further details that after arriving in Kolkata, the passenger received threatening messages on social media platforms from individuals claiming to know the accused flight attendant.
The lawsuit alleges multiple counts of negligence by Qatar Airways, including the inadequate response to the theft claim, failure to protect the passenger's identity, and insufficient compensation for the stolen funds. Specific allegations include breach of contract, negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and intentional tort.
These incidents raise concerns about the carefully cultivated image of Qatar Airways as a premium carrier. The airline has consistently been ranked among the world's best for its business class service, earning numerous industry awards for its premium offerings and customer experience.
The affected passenger emphasized that their expectations for service recovery were particularly high given the premium fare paid for a business class flight. Industry analysts note that theft by airline staff can significantly erode consumer trust, especially when the subsequent handling appears to minimize the seriousness of the violation.
The situation was further complicated by Qatar Airways' alleged requirement that the victim sign a 'release and discharge' form in exchange for the mobile phone replacement cost. The passenger argues that this form does not adequately address the full scope of their losses, including lost productivity, emergency security measures for compromised accounts, and overall disruption to their travel.
Qatar Airways has not publicly commented on this specific incident. However, the airline's conditions of carriage typically limit liability for personal belongings, a clause that becomes more complex when staff-related misconduct, rather than simple loss, is involved.
[Copyright (c) Global Economic Times. All Rights Reserved.]
