The Atacama Desert in northern Chile, home to the clearest and purest skies in the world, is where world-class observatories like the European Southern Observatory's (ESO) Very Large Telescope (VLT) are located, leading humanity's exploration of space. These observatories have played a pivotal role in transforming Chile from a country centered on mining to a hub for providing advanced scientific services. Astronomy has also been considered a crucial value, fostering related academic fields and industries, and instilling dreams of science in the younger generation.
However, this valuable asset is currently under serious threat due to the INNA Project being promoted by AES Andes, a Chilean subsidiary of the U.S. corporation AES Corporation. The project, which aims to export ammonia and generate power, is located close to the observatories, raising concerns that it could have a fatal impact on astronomical observation. The author emphasizes that the sky where the observatories are located is not merely a matter of a 'location' given by chance but a matter of 'will' to protect for the benefit of all humanity.
The Government's Contradictory Actions
The INNA Project is currently undergoing an assessment by the Environmental Impact Assessment Service (SEA), but the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has already warned of the project's risks based on international agreements. The scientific community has also clearly stated its opposition, raising specific technical issues that could negatively affect astronomical observation, such as vibration, evaporation, and atmospheric turbulence. However, despite this clear evidence of opposition, the project continues to be assessed.
What is even more concerning is the ambiguous attitude of the Gabriel Boric government. The author mentions the case of the former director of the Antofagasta Regional Environmental Impact Assessment Service (SEA), who was dismissed after prematurely terminating the Paposo power plant project. The author criticizes this as a signal from the government that it prioritizes economic gain over environmental preservation under the pretext of 'attracting investment.' This decision gives the impression that the government, like an emperor in a Roman amphitheater, is arbitrarily deciding the fate of the project. The author points out that this is equivalent to handing over Chile's natural heritage and public goods to the greed of a few powerful individuals and corporations.
A Choice for the Future
The author argues that true development is not for the few but is created through the collective participation and discussion of all members. If the Chilean government does not show the will to protect its unique asset of astronomy, it is no different from selling off Chile's present and future for a cheap price. This op-ed raises a critical question: will Chile preserve its pristine natural environment and protect science as a public good for humanity, or will it sacrifice everything for short-term economic gain?
Ultimately, Chile's choice will be a momentous decision that tests its responsibility to preserve humanity's intellectual heritage, transcending a mere national development path.
[Copyright (c) Global Economic Times. All Rights Reserved.]
