• 2025.09.06 (Sat)
  • All articles
  • LOGIN
  • JOIN
Global Economic Times
APEC2025KOREA가이드북
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life
  • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Ko Yong-chul Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
  • Cherry Garden Story
MENU
 
Home > Synthesis

Philippine Defense Chief Puts Brakes on Large-Scale F-16 Purchase from US: "Nothing Decided Yet"

Min Gyu Mi Reporter / Updated : 2025-06-03 21:48:37
  • -
  • +
  • Print

SINGAPORE – The Philippine Secretary of National Defense has expressed skepticism about a potential $5.6 billion purchase of US-made F-16 fighter jets, which was approved by the US State Department in April, stating that no decision has been made yet on the acquisition.

During a press conference at the Asia Security Summit (Shangri-La Dialogue) held in Singapore from May 31 to June 2, Philippine Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro stated that the Philippines has not yet received a formal offer to purchase the 4th-generation fighter jets. He added that even if an offer were to come, the Department of National Defense (DND) would not necessarily know if it wanted the aircraft.

"There's nothing for me to review," Teodoro said in an interview, emphasizing that discussions about purchasing F-16s were premature. He also dismissed the F-16 sale approval as "media hype" and did not explain why the US State Department had approved it earlier. "We have not yet decided when we are going to acquire a multi-role fighter, or what model," he said.

US F-16 Sale Approval and the Philippines' Practical Concerns

Earlier in April, the US State Department approved the potential sale of 20 F-16 fighter jets to the Philippines, including missiles, bombs, and other ammunition, totaling nearly $5.6 billion. This amount was expected to constitute a significant portion of the Philippine defense budget. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), the Philippines spends approximately $6 billion annually on defense (1.3% of its GDP). The F-16 purchase, amounting to the Philippines' annual defense budget, would inevitably impose a substantial financial burden on the Philippine government.

US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth visited the Philippines in March to strengthen alliances in preparation for competition with China. Hegseth and Teodoro met again in Singapore, where Hegseth warned that military threats posed by Beijing could be "imminent" and urged allies to increase defense spending.

For some Philippine officials, the F-16 fighter jet sale was seen as a symbol of long-term US commitment and confidence in the Philippine military's ability to handle advanced equipment. However, immediately after the announcement, other officials in the Philippines began to question how such a large-scale purchase could be afforded without US assistance. Last year, the US provided $500 million in long-term security assistance to the Philippines, but continued support would require additional legislative approval from the US Congress.

During the Biden administration, the US and the Philippines agreed on a "roadmap" for arms purchases over the next few years to modernize the Philippine military. This plan primarily consists of equipment to help monitor and protect the Philippines' vast coastline, and it did not include high-performance fighter jets. This background explains the Philippines' cautious stance on the F-16 purchase. The Philippines' defense modernization goal prioritizes strengthening its maritime surveillance and patrol capabilities to effectively defend its vast maritime domain and respond to illegal fishing and territorial disputes, rather than immediately acquiring expensive, state-of-the-art fighter jets.

 
South China Sea Territorial Disputes and the Philippines' Firm Stance

At the Shangri-La Dialogue, Secretary Teodoro engaged in a somewhat sharp exchange with the Chinese delegation, who posed critical questions about the Philippines' alliance with the US. Chinese coast guard vessels routinely harass Philippine vessels in the South China Sea. Beijing claims most of the South China Sea as its territory, despite a 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

From the podium, Teodoro stated unequivocally that "China needs to build a lot of trust to be an effective negotiating partner," and that "we must tell it as it is." This clearly declared that the Philippines would not accept China's unilateral claims in the South China Sea and would adhere to a principled stance based on international law.

Due to its territorial disputes with China in the South China Sea, maritime security has become an urgent issue for the Philippines. While the air superiority provided by advanced fighter jets like the F-16 could contribute to strengthening the Philippines' long-term defense capabilities, the judgment seems to be that strengthening maritime surveillance and defense capabilities to respond to immediate threats is more pressing.

 
Economic Burden and Re-prioritization of Defense Strategy

The cautious stance on the F-16 purchase can be interpreted as part of the Philippines' effort to re-prioritize its defense strategy and address its geopolitical situation. The Philippines currently faces various security challenges, including terrorism threats and disaster response, in addition to the South China Sea territorial dispute with China. In this situation, it is highly probable that the decision was made to focus investments on assets that can respond to immediate threats, such as patrol vessels, maritime surveillance systems, and coastal defense missiles, rather than acquiring expensive advanced fighter jets.

Furthermore, the Philippines is seeking cooperation with other countries, not just the US, for defense modernization. For example, it is acquiring patrol vessels and landing ships from South Korea, thus strengthening its defense capabilities in various ways. This can be seen as part of a strategy to reduce defense dependence on a single country and to build defense capabilities more flexibly by securing diverse suppliers.

Ultimately, the Philippine Department of National Defense's current position reflects the Philippines' defense policy to prioritize efficient use of defense spending and responses to realistic security threats. While the F-16 purchase could contribute to the modernization of the Philippine Air Force in the long term, it is understood that a cautious approach is necessary given the Philippines' most urgent security issues and economic capacity. The future of the Philippines' acquisition of multi-role fighters, their scale, and the direction of its security cooperation with the United States remain to be seen.

[Copyright (c) Global Economic Times. All Rights Reserved.]

  • #NATO
  • #OTAN
  • #OECD
  • #G20
  • #globaleconomictimes
  • #Korea
  • #UNPEACEKOR
  • #micorea
  • #mykorea
  • #UN
  • #UNESCO
  • #nammidonganews
  • #sin
Min Gyu Mi Reporter
Min Gyu Mi Reporter

Popular articles

  • Incheon's Island Tourism Boom Raises Concerns Over Environmental Strain

  • Increased Walking Intensity, Not Just Volume, Key to Heart Health

  • New Financial Products Target Global Travelers and Tech Investors

I like it
Share
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Kakaotalk
  • LINE
  • BAND
  • NAVER
  • https://globaleconomictimes.kr/article/1065617262005232 Copy URL copied.
Comments >

Comments 0

Weekly Hot Issue

  • Israel Launches Airstrikes on Gaza City After Evacuation Order
  • US "475 people arrested at a Korean company site in Georgia… many are Korean" Official Announcement
  • Danang's Korean Community Takes a Big Leap Toward a New International School
  • Thailand's Political Landscape Shifts as Conservative Anutin Charnvirakul is Elected New Prime Minister 
  • The 10th Ulsan Ulju Mountain Film Festival: A Festival for the Entire Family
  • Russia Urges U.S. to Embrace Arctic Economic Partnership

Most Viewed

1
U.S. Government Acquires Controlling Stake in Intel, Signaling New Era of State-Corporate Alliance
2
Mitsubishi Pulls Out of Japanese Offshore Wind Projects Amid Soaring Costs
3
Brazil Weighs Legal Action as U.S. Tariffs Escalate Trade Tensions
4
The 34th Korean Dance Festival Opens a New Chapter for Daejeon with Dance
5
'K-Pop Demon Hunters' Is This Summer's Unlikely Juggernaut, Captivating U.S. Parents and Surging to Disney-Level Status
광고문의
임시1
임시3
임시2

Hot Issue

'Are you coming to get me?' The Last Plea of a Gazan Girl Resonates at the Venice Film Festival

U.S. Greenlights $32.5 Million in Aid for Nigeria Amid Rising Hunger Crisis

New Ebola Outbreak Confirmed in the DRC, 15 Dead

Nigerian River Tragedy: Overloaded Boat Capsizes, Leaving Dozens Dead

China’s online public opinion manipulation goes beyond Korea

Global Economic Times
korocamia@naver.com
CEO : LEE YEON-SIL
Publisher : KO YONG-CHUL
Registration number : Seoul, A55681
Registration Date : 2024-10-24
Youth Protection Manager: KO YONG-CHUL
Singapore Headquarters
5A Woodlands Road #11-34 The Tennery. S'677728
Korean Branch
Phone : +82(0)10 4724 5264
#304, 6 Nonhyeon-ro 111-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul
Copyright © Global Economic Times All Rights Reserved
  • 에이펙2025
  • 우리방송
  • APEC2025가이드북TV
Search
Category
  • All articles
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life
  • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Ko Yong-chul Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
  • Cherry Garden Story
  • Multicultural News
  • Jobs & Workers
  • APEC 2025 KOREA GUIDE