• 2026.09.05 (Sat)
  • All articles
  • LOGIN
  • JOIN
Global Economic Times
[등록] 2026-09-01 15:48:31
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Well+Being
  • Travel
  • Eco-News
  • Education
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life
    • International Student Report
    • With Ambassador
  • Column
    • Cho Kijo Column
    • Cherry Garden Story
    • Ko Yong-chul Column
    • Kim Seul-Ong Column
    • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
MENU
 
Home > Distribution Economy

Vietnam Eyes Overhaul of Property Transfer Tax System to Combat Evasion and Boost Revenue

Ana Fernanda Reporter / Updated : 2025-05-07 13:27:41
  • -
  • +
  • Print

Hanoi, Vietnam – The Vietnamese government is actively pursuing a significant reform of its property transfer tax system, proposing a new framework that could impose a tax rate of up to 20% on the capital gains derived from real estate transactions. This move, outlined in a revised Personal Income Tax Law recently submitted by the Ministry of Finance to the National Assembly, signals a strong intent to address widespread tax evasion and enhance transparency within the burgeoning Vietnamese property market.

The current tax regime in Vietnam levies a flat 2% tax on the total declared value of transferred properties, including houses and land. While seemingly straightforward, this uniform rate has inadvertently fostered a culture of underreporting transaction values. Known colloquially as "down contracts," these agreements intentionally state a lower price than the actual amount exchanged, primarily to minimize the tax burden for both buyers and sellers. This pervasive practice has resulted in substantial losses in tax revenue for the state and has significantly impeded efforts to establish a transparent and reliable real estate market.

Recognizing the shortcomings of the existing system, the Ministry of Finance has put forth two distinct alternative taxation models for consideration. The first proposal aligns the property transfer tax rate with the current corporate tax rate, setting it at 20% of the actual capital gains realized from the sale. This method, common in many developed economies, aims to tax the profit generated from the appreciation of the property's value. However, the Ministry acknowledges a critical prerequisite for the successful implementation of this scheme: the availability of credible and verifiable data regarding the original purchase price, the selling price, and any associated costs incurred during the ownership period.

The second proposed model offers a simpler approach, suggesting a flat tax rate of 2% applied to the total transaction value, mirroring the current system but presumably with stricter enforcement and valuation mechanisms. The Ministry of Finance explicitly stated that the choice between these two models will be contingent upon the robustness and accessibility of reliable real estate transaction data. "The 20% tax rate scheme requires reliable data to verify the selling price and other costs. If data verification is difficult, a simple method of applying a 2% tax rate to the total transaction value may be applied. The method for calculating the tax rate will depend on data availability," the Ministry explained in its statement.

The government's push for reform is driven by a clear understanding of the detrimental effects of the current system. The widespread use of down contracts not only erodes the national tax base but also distorts market prices, making it difficult to obtain an accurate assessment of real estate values. This lack of transparency can hinder investment, create instability, and ultimately undermine the sustainable growth of the property sector.

International experience highlights the importance of effective property transfer taxes in generating government revenue and promoting market integrity. Many countries employ capital gains taxes on property transfers, often with varying rates depending on the holding period and the nature of the property. These systems typically require robust record-keeping and valuation processes to ensure accurate tax collection. The challenges Vietnam faces in implementing a capital gains tax underscore the need for a well-functioning property registration and valuation system.

The Ministry of Finance has explicitly recognized this crucial requirement, with a senior official emphasizing the necessity of "a more robust national real estate database" to facilitate a fairer and more efficient taxation system. Such a database would ideally include comprehensive information on property transactions, ownership history, declared values, and potentially even independent valuations. The establishment of a reliable national property database is not merely a technical undertaking; it is a fundamental step towards fostering transparency, reducing tax evasion, and creating a level playing field for all participants in the real estate market.

The introduction of a potentially higher property transfer tax rate, particularly one based on capital gains, could have significant implications for the Vietnamese real estate market. While it is expected to boost government revenue and curb tax evasion, it could also influence investment decisions and potentially lead to adjustments in property prices. Developers and investors will likely scrutinize the details of the new legislation and its implementation to assess the potential impact on their activities.

Furthermore, the success of the new tax regime will heavily rely on the government's ability to effectively enforce the regulations and ensure compliance. This will require not only a robust legal framework but also adequate resources for tax administration and the development of the necessary data infrastructure. Public awareness campaigns and clear guidelines will also be essential to ensure that taxpayers understand their obligations under the new system.

The proposed reforms to Vietnam's property transfer tax system represent a significant step towards modernizing the country's fiscal framework and promoting greater transparency in its real estate market. By considering a shift towards taxing actual capital gains and recognizing the critical need for a comprehensive national property database, the government is signaling its commitment to addressing long-standing issues of tax evasion and market distortion. The outcome of the National Assembly's deliberations on these proposals will have a profound impact on the future of Vietnam's property sector and its contribution to the national economy.

[Copyright (c) Global Economic Times. All Rights Reserved.]

  • #NATO
  • #OTAN
  • #OECD
  • #G20
  • #globaleconomictimes
  • #Korea
  • #UNPEACEKOR
  • #micorea
  • #mykorea
  • #newsk
  • #UN
  • #UNESCO
  • #nammidongane
Ana Fernanda Reporter
Ana Fernanda Reporter

Popular articles

  • JD.com Establishes Korean Subsidiary, Inks $1.5 Million Direct Sourcing Deal for K-Consumer Goods

  • OpenAI Delays Release of Next-Gen Model ‘Astra’ Over Autonomous Cyber Threat Risks

  • Ukraine Proposes "Black Sea Truce" to Stabilize Global Grain Markets

I like it
Share
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Kakaotalk
  • LINE
  • BAND
  • NAVER
  • https://globaleconomictimes.kr/article/1065587199293765 Copy URL copied.
Comments >

Comments 0

Weekly Hot Issue

  • Jensen Huang Donates 13.5 Billion Won to Flood-Stricken Nepal
  • OpenAI Unveils ‘GPT-6 Astra,’ Declaring the “Era of AGI”
  • “Korea to Surpass Japan, Becoming the World’s Oldest Nation by 2060… 4 out of 10 to Be Aged 65 or Older”
  • "To Dedicate Myself to Korean Football Will Be Proved on the Pitch"
  • "AAPI Voter Wave Shakes Georgia": Michelle Kang Wins Landslide Victory in State House District 99 Democratic Primary
  • Consulate General Announces Employment Support Program for Korean-Brazilian Youth: “From Korean Language to Certifications and Employment” 

Most Viewed

1
Bridging Nations, Building Futures: Reflections of Ethiopia's Ambassador to the Republic of Korea
2
Hyundai Motor Faces First Full-Scale Strike in a Decade Over Wage Impasse 
3
President Lee Declares Geoje and Tongyeong 'Special Disaster Zones' Amid Heavy Rain Damage
4
MegazoneSoft Completes Google Workspace-Based AI Transformation for Nongshim Group 
5
Japan Carries Out First Execution in 14 Months Under Prime Minister Takaichi, Stoking Debate on Capital Punishment
광고문의
임시1
임시3
임시2

Hot Issue

“Thank you for staying alive”… Miracle survival of 2 people 9 days after Nepal's massive flood

NAND Market Surges 70%... 'Samsung and Hynix' Sweep Global 1st and 2nd Places

Jensen Huang Donates 13.5 Billion Won to Flood-Stricken Nepal

K-Next-Generation Reactor Breaks Through to Denmark Export

Fashion Runway Show 2026

Global Economic Times
korocamia@naver.com
CEO : LEE YEON-SIL
Publisher : KO YONG-CHUL
Registration number : Seoul, A55681
Registration Date : 2024-10-24
Youth Protection Manager: KO YONG-CHUL
Singapore Headquarters
5A Woodlands Road #11-34 The Tennery. S'677728
Korean Branch
Phone : +82(0)10 4724 5264
#304, 6 Nonhyeon-ro 111-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul
Copyright © Global Economic Times All Rights Reserved
  • 향기네무료급식
  • BCB부천방송
  • 반달곰 프로젝트
Search
Category
  • All articles
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Well+Being
  • Travel
  • Eco-News
  • Education
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life 
    • 전체
    • International Student Report
    • With Ambassador
  • Column 
    • 전체
    • Cho Kijo Column
    • Cherry Garden Story
    • Ko Yong-chul Column
    • Kim Seul-Ong Column
    • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
  • Overseas Koreans
  • Multicultural News