• 2025.09.06 (Sat)
  • All articles
  • LOGIN
  • JOIN
Global Economic Times
APEC2025KOREA가이드북
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life
  • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Ko Yong-chul Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
  • Cherry Garden Story
MENU
 
Home > World

Sheinbaum Stands Firm: Mexico Rejects US Military Intervention, Affirms Sovereignty

Eugenio Rodolfo Sanabria Reporter / Updated : 2025-05-05 10:07:48
  • -
  • +
  • Print

In a resolute defense of national sovereignty, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has publicly rebuffed a proposition from U.S. President Donald Trump to deploy the American military within Mexico's borders to combat drug cartels. Speaking to a gathering of supporters in the eastern part of the nation, President Sheinbaum addressed recent reports detailing a contentious phone conversation with President Trump, reiterating her unwavering stance against foreign military intervention on Mexican soil.

The controversy stems from a Wall Street Journal report outlining a call last month between the two leaders. According to the report, President Trump pressed President Sheinbaum on the need for a more substantial U.S. military role in dismantling the powerful and deeply entrenched drug cartels operating within Mexico. President Sheinbaum directly addressed this account, stating, "President Trump offered, 'How can we assist in your fight against drug trafficking? We are prepared to send the U.S. military to help.' To this, my response was unequivocal: 'President Trump, no.'" Emphasizing the foundational principle at stake, she declared, "Sovereignty is not a bargaining chip; it is a cherished value that we must safeguard and hold dear."

While the White House has yet to issue an official response to President Sheinbaum's public comments, her firm and direct rejection underscores a significant point of contention between the two nations. It represents a direct challenge to the approach favored by the U.S. administration, which has increasingly viewed the cartel presence in Mexico as a national security threat demanding assertive action, potentially including military measures.

The U.S. government under President Trump has consistently portrayed Mexican drug cartels as a grave danger, even taking the significant step of labeling them as "foreign terrorist organizations." This designation, formalized on February 19th, triggered a range of punitive measures aimed at crippling the cartels' operations, including the freezing of their financial assets, the imposition of travel restrictions on their members, and the potential seizure of their holdings within the United States. Beyond these financial and legal pressures, the U.S. has also intensified its military posture along the shared border, deploying additional troops and bolstering aerial surveillance activities aimed at disrupting the flow of illicit narcotics.

Despite this escalating pressure from the north, President Sheinbaum's pronouncements signal a clear red line for Mexico. Her emphatic statement, "We can collaborate, but this collaboration must occur within the confines of our respective territories. The presence of U.S. military forces within Mexican territory is utterly unacceptable," resonated deeply with a populace historically wary of foreign intervention. This sentiment is rooted in past experiences and a strong sense of national pride, factors that the Mexican government cannot afford to ignore.

Experts in U.S.-Mexico relations anticipate that President Sheinbaum's firm stance will have considerable ramifications for bilateral ties. The U.S. strategy for combating drug trafficking relies, to a significant extent, on cooperation from Mexican authorities. Without Mexico's active participation and consent, the effectiveness of any unilateral U.S. military action would be severely limited and could potentially be counterproductive, inflaming nationalist sentiments and hindering collaborative efforts.

The current impasse highlights a fundamental divergence in how the two nations perceive and seek to address the complex issue of drug trafficking. The U.S. appears to be leaning towards a more coercive approach, leveraging military power as a potential tool to compel Mexican action. Conversely, Mexico firmly advocates for a solution based on mutual respect for sovereignty, genuine collaboration within established legal frameworks, and addressing the root causes of the drug trade.

The unfolding situation places a significant spotlight on the future trajectory of U.S.-Mexico relations and the strategies that will be employed to tackle the persistent challenge of drug trafficking. The international community will be closely observing whether the two neighbors can navigate this delicate issue through constructive dialogue and find a path forward that respects national sovereignty while effectively addressing shared security concerns. The interplay between Mexico's commitment to its sovereignty and the U.S.'s pursuit of its security objectives will undoubtedly shape the dynamics of this crucial bilateral relationship in the years to come.

[Copyright (c) Global Economic Times. All Rights Reserved.]

  • #NATO
  • #OTAN
  • #OECD
  • #G20
  • #globaleconomictimes
  • #Korea
  • #UNPEACEKOR
  • #micorea
  • #mykorea
  • #newsk
  • #UN
  • #UNESCO
  • #nammidongane
Eugenio Rodolfo Sanabria Reporter
Eugenio Rodolfo Sanabria Reporter

Popular articles

  • President Trump Announces Sweeping 100% Tariff on Imported Semiconductors

  • NVIDIA, AMD to Pay 15% of China Revenue for Export License, Report Says

  • US Ends 'De Minimis' Exemption Permanently, No Exceptions for Any Country

I like it
Share
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Kakaotalk
  • LINE
  • BAND
  • NAVER
  • https://globaleconomictimes.kr/article/1065575238125448 Copy URL copied.
Comments >

Comments 0

Weekly Hot Issue

  • Israel Launches Airstrikes on Gaza City After Evacuation Order
  • US "475 people arrested at a Korean company site in Georgia… many are Korean" Official Announcement
  • Danang's Korean Community Takes a Big Leap Toward a New International School
  • Thailand's Political Landscape Shifts as Conservative Anutin Charnvirakul is Elected New Prime Minister 
  • The 10th Ulsan Ulju Mountain Film Festival: A Festival for the Entire Family
  • Russia Urges U.S. to Embrace Arctic Economic Partnership

Most Viewed

1
U.S. Government Acquires Controlling Stake in Intel, Signaling New Era of State-Corporate Alliance
2
Mitsubishi Pulls Out of Japanese Offshore Wind Projects Amid Soaring Costs
3
Brazil Weighs Legal Action as U.S. Tariffs Escalate Trade Tensions
4
The 34th Korean Dance Festival Opens a New Chapter for Daejeon with Dance
5
'K-Pop Demon Hunters' Is This Summer's Unlikely Juggernaut, Captivating U.S. Parents and Surging to Disney-Level Status
광고문의
임시1
임시3
임시2

Hot Issue

'Are you coming to get me?' The Last Plea of a Gazan Girl Resonates at the Venice Film Festival

U.S. Greenlights $32.5 Million in Aid for Nigeria Amid Rising Hunger Crisis

New Ebola Outbreak Confirmed in the DRC, 15 Dead

Nigerian River Tragedy: Overloaded Boat Capsizes, Leaving Dozens Dead

China’s online public opinion manipulation goes beyond Korea

Global Economic Times
korocamia@naver.com
CEO : LEE YEON-SIL
Publisher : KO YONG-CHUL
Registration number : Seoul, A55681
Registration Date : 2024-10-24
Youth Protection Manager: KO YONG-CHUL
Singapore Headquarters
5A Woodlands Road #11-34 The Tennery. S'677728
Korean Branch
Phone : +82(0)10 4724 5264
#304, 6 Nonhyeon-ro 111-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul
Copyright © Global Economic Times All Rights Reserved
  • 에이펙2025
  • 우리방송
  • APEC2025가이드북TV
Search
Category
  • All articles
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life
  • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Ko Yong-chul Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
  • Cherry Garden Story
  • Multicultural News
  • Jobs & Workers
  • APEC 2025 KOREA GUIDE