• 2025.09.06 (Sat)
  • All articles
  • LOGIN
  • JOIN
Global Economic Times
APEC2025KOREA가이드북
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life
  • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Ko Yong-chul Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
  • Cherry Garden Story
MENU
 
Home > World

US Supreme Court Partially Allows Trump's Birthright Citizenship Restrictions; Effective in 28 States

KO YONG-CHUL Reporter / Updated : 2025-06-28 07:59:57
  • -
  • +
  • Print

 

WASHINGTON D.C. – The U.S. Supreme Court has put a stop to lower courts' nationwide injunctions against President Donald Trump's "birthright citizenship restriction" executive order. This ruling effectively allows the executive order to be reimplemented in 28 states after a 30-day grace period, which is seen as providing legal legitimacy to the Trump administration's immigration policies.

On June 27 (local time), the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision with six conservative justices and three liberal justices, ruled that lower courts cannot issue nationwide injunctions to halt federal government policies. However, the Court reserved judgment on the constitutionality of the birthright citizenship policy itself. As a result, the executive order can take effect in 28 states, excluding the 22 states and Washington D.C. that filed lawsuits and obtained preliminary injunctions, starting 30 days from now.

This ruling addresses the nationwide injunctions issued by federal district courts in Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington state against the Trump executive order. The Supreme Court determined that courts overstepped their authority by issuing orders that extended beyond the scope of the original plaintiffs in the lawsuit. Justice Barrett emphasized, "While the executive branch must certainly follow the law, the judiciary also cannot overstep its role. Courts can only provide relief limited to individual cases and parties."

Conversely, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, along with Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented, arguing, "The majority ignored the unconstitutionality of the executive order and merely questioned the court's authority. Since the executive order is clearly unlawful, a nationwide injunction is necessary to block it."

On his first day in office, January 20, President Trump signed an executive order that denies citizenship to children born in the U.S. if neither parent is a U.S. citizen or legal permanent resident. In response, attorneys general from 22 states led by Democratic governors, along with Washington D.C., immigrant rights organizations, and pregnant immigrants, filed constitutional challenges. Some lower courts had previously issued preliminary injunctions to halt the executive order's enforcement.

The 22 states where the birthright citizenship ban has been enjoined are Washington, Arizona, Illinois, Oregon, New Jersey, Massachusetts, California, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Michigan, Colorado, Delaware, Nevada, Hawaii, Maryland, Maine, Minnesota, New Mexico, Vermont, Wisconsin, and North Carolina. They argue that the policy violates the 14th Amendment's clause stating, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." This clause was adopted after the Civil War in 1868 to guarantee citizenship to those born after the emancipation of slaves.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) issued a statement strongly criticizing the executive order, calling it "plainly illegal and cruel" and asserting that "it should not be applied to anyone." After the ruling, Justice Sotomayor advised affected parents to "promptly file class-action lawsuits and seek temporary restraining orders," and the plaintiffs in the Maryland case applied for class-action certification just two hours after the ruling, signaling continued opposition.

This Supreme Court ruling is expected to intensify the debate over birthright citizenship. A Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted from June 11-12 showed that only 24% of respondents supported abolishing birthright citizenship, while 52% opposed it. Notably, 84% of Democratic supporters opposed it, whereas among Republican supporters, 43% favored it and 24% opposed it, demonstrating stark political polarization. Immediately after the ruling, President Trump hailed it as a "huge win" on social media, interpreting the decision as a boost to his immigration policies. This ensures that birthright citizenship will be a significant issue in the upcoming elections.

[Copyright (c) Global Economic Times. All Rights Reserved.]

  • #NATO
  • #OTAN
  • #OECD
  • #G20
  • #globaleconomictimes
  • #Korea
  • #UNPEACEKOR
  • #micorea
  • #mykorea
  • #UN
  • #UNESCO
  • #nammidonganews
  • #sin
KO YONG-CHUL Reporter
KO YONG-CHUL Reporter
Reporter Page

Popular articles

  • Artist Jeon Ok-hee Connects Korea and Brazil with Solo Exhibition, 'Journey of Light'

  • Korea and Vietnam Forge Stronger Strategic Ties

  • Hidden Meanings of the Number 18 in Everyday Life and Mathematics

I like it
Share
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Kakaotalk
  • LINE
  • BAND
  • NAVER
  • https://globaleconomictimes.kr/article/1065567564467534 Copy URL copied.
Comments >

Comments 0

Weekly Hot Issue

  • Israel Launches Airstrikes on Gaza City After Evacuation Order
  • US "475 people arrested at a Korean company site in Georgia… many are Korean" Official Announcement
  • Danang's Korean Community Takes a Big Leap Toward a New International School
  • Thailand's Political Landscape Shifts as Conservative Anutin Charnvirakul is Elected New Prime Minister 
  • The 10th Ulsan Ulju Mountain Film Festival: A Festival for the Entire Family
  • Russia Urges U.S. to Embrace Arctic Economic Partnership

Most Viewed

1
U.S. Government Acquires Controlling Stake in Intel, Signaling New Era of State-Corporate Alliance
2
Mitsubishi Pulls Out of Japanese Offshore Wind Projects Amid Soaring Costs
3
Brazil Weighs Legal Action as U.S. Tariffs Escalate Trade Tensions
4
The 34th Korean Dance Festival Opens a New Chapter for Daejeon with Dance
5
'K-Pop Demon Hunters' Is This Summer's Unlikely Juggernaut, Captivating U.S. Parents and Surging to Disney-Level Status
광고문의
임시1
임시3
임시2

Hot Issue

'Are you coming to get me?' The Last Plea of a Gazan Girl Resonates at the Venice Film Festival

U.S. Greenlights $32.5 Million in Aid for Nigeria Amid Rising Hunger Crisis

New Ebola Outbreak Confirmed in the DRC, 15 Dead

Nigerian River Tragedy: Overloaded Boat Capsizes, Leaving Dozens Dead

China’s online public opinion manipulation goes beyond Korea

Global Economic Times
korocamia@naver.com
CEO : LEE YEON-SIL
Publisher : KO YONG-CHUL
Registration number : Seoul, A55681
Registration Date : 2024-10-24
Youth Protection Manager: KO YONG-CHUL
Singapore Headquarters
5A Woodlands Road #11-34 The Tennery. S'677728
Korean Branch
Phone : +82(0)10 4724 5264
#304, 6 Nonhyeon-ro 111-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul
Copyright © Global Economic Times All Rights Reserved
  • 에이펙2025
  • 우리방송
  • APEC2025가이드북TV
Search
Category
  • All articles
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life
  • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Ko Yong-chul Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
  • Cherry Garden Story
  • Multicultural News
  • Jobs & Workers
  • APEC 2025 KOREA GUIDE