• 2026.06.05 (Fri)
  • All articles
  • LOGIN
  • JOIN
Global Economic Times
fashionrunwayshow2026
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Well+Being
  • Travel
  • Eco-News
  • Education
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life
    • International Student Report
    • With Ambassador
  • Column
    • Cho Kijo Column
    • Cherry Garden Story
    • Ko Yong-chul Column
    • Kim Seul-Ong Column
    • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
MENU
 
Home > Industry

Trump's "Novel" Tariff Calculation Method Sparks Criticism: Korea's Potential 50% Reciprocal Tariff?

Yim Kwangsoo Correspondent / Updated : 2025-04-03 17:00:55
  • -
  • +
  • Print

Cheonan, South Korea - The United States Trade Representative (USTR) has unveiled the methodology behind the Trump administration's calculation of reciprocal tariffs by country, revealing a seemingly simplistic approach that has drawn sharp criticism for being arbitrary and lacking economic basis. The formula essentially divides the U.S. trade deficit with a specific country by the total value of imports from that country.

According to the USTR's website, this method was adopted due to the "complexity or impossibility" of calculating the impact of numerous tariffs, regulations, taxes, and other policies on trade deficits. The stated goal is to determine a reciprocal tariff rate that would theoretically eliminate the bilateral trade deficit for the United States.

Applying this formula, the USTR indicated that South Korea could face a reciprocal tariff rate of approximately 26%. This figure is derived from South Korea's $66 billion trade surplus with the U.S. in the past year, divided by its $131.5 billion in exports to the U.S., resulting in roughly 50%. The USTR then applied an approximate 50% "discount rate" to arrive at the 26% figure, seemingly based on the assertion that South Korea imposes a 50% tariff on U.S. goods – a claim disputed by Seoul.

A similar calculation was applied to the European Union (EU), which recorded a $235.6 billion trade surplus with the U.S. on $605.8 billion worth of exports. This yields a tariff rate of 39%, and the USTR subsequently levied a reciprocal tariff of around 20% on the EU.

However, the methodology has been met with widespread skepticism. The concept of reciprocal tariffs traditionally involves matching the actual tariffs imposed by a trading partner. Linking reciprocal tariffs directly to the trade deficit lacks established economic rationale. Critics suggest that the USTR's lean staff of around 200 may have resorted to this "flawed method" due to the impracticality of analyzing the intricate tariff structures across numerous product categories and countries.

The South Korean government has expressed bewilderment at the 26% reciprocal tariff rate proposed by the U.S. Under the existing Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA), the average tariff rate imposed by South Korea on U.S. goods is a mere 0.79%. A representative from South Korea's Ministry of Economy and Finance stated on Thursday, "The 26% tariff rate was unexpected and considered quite high. We will examine the basis of this calculation and continue negotiations with the U.S. based on our findings."

The International Finance Center in Seoul echoed these concerns in a briefing, noting that "this tariff rate was calculated using a method unrelated to the actual tariff rates between the two countries." They further speculated that the "questionable method of calculating the figures could be a strategy to set an initial burdensome tariff rate to use as leverage in future negotiations, or it could genuinely aim to reduce the goods deficit in trade with major countries."

Ian Bremmer, President of political risk consulting firm Eurasia Group, also weighed in on the issue via social media. After explaining Trump's reciprocal tariff calculation method, he commented, "This explains why the tariffs being levied on the US look fictional. Unbelievably dumb."

The development raises concerns about the future of international trade relations and the potential for escalating trade tensions based on what many perceive as an unsound and overly simplistic approach to tariff policy. Negotiations between South Korea and the United States are expected to continue as Seoul seeks clarity and a more equitable basis for determining tariff rates.

[Copyright (c) Global Economic Times. All Rights Reserved.]

Yim Kwangsoo Correspondent
Yim Kwangsoo Correspondent

Popular articles

  • AIDC Emerges as New Growth Engine for Telcos, Filling the Void Left by Stagnant Wireless Revenues

  • U.S. World Cup "Host City Boom" Fizzles: Hotel Bookings Slump One Month Before Kickoff

  • "Countdown to Renewed Strikes on Iran?" At Least 50 U.S. Aerial Refueling Tankers Massed at Israeli Airport

I like it
Share
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Kakaotalk
  • LINE
  • BAND
  • NAVER
  • https://globaleconomictimes.kr/article/1065599987151203 Copy URL copied.
Comments >

Comments 0

Weekly Hot Issue

  • Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to Arrive in South Korea for "Sam-So" Meeting with Tech Tycoons
  • Samsung Electronics Super-Enterprise Union Loses Majority Status Amid Backlash Over Bonus Disparities
  • Samsung to Embed Vital Signs and Heart Health Scores in Upcoming Galaxy Watch9 Lineup
  • Apple Honors Digital Excellence: 12 Exceptional Apps and Games Celebrated at the 2026 Design Awards
  • Nexon Revamps Signature Youth Coding Competition into AI-Driven 'Nexon Young Programmers Cup'
  • Tech University of Korea Gathers 200 Game and AI Researchers to Discuss Industrial Expansion

Most Viewed

1
From a moment of collective sacrifice to a moment of collective democracy: The Timing of the Election in Ethiopia and Korea
2
U.S. Holds Off on Immediate Comprehensive Semiconductor Tariffs, but Pressure Mounts for Samsung and SK Hynix to Accelerate Domestic Investments
3
[Interview] "Halal is Not a Religious Regulation, but a 'Trust Infrastructure'… Creating a Premium 'K-Halal' Centered on Data and Platforms"
4
‘600 Million Won Bonus’ at Samsung Electronics Triggers Deep Sense of Relative Deprivation Among Korean Workers
5
Musk’s SpaceX Secures Space Hegemony with Flawless Starship V3 Recovery Ahead of Historic IPO
광고문의
임시1
임시3
임시2

Hot Issue

Murata Unveils Next-Gen Resin Electrode MLCC for Automotive Applications

Samsung to Embed Vital Signs and Heart Health Scores in Upcoming Galaxy Watch9 Lineup

L&F Plus Secures KRW 220 Billion from National Growth Fund to Anchor South Korea’s First Mass LFP Cathode Production

Samsung Electronics Super-Enterprise Union Loses Majority Status Amid Backlash Over Bonus Disparities

Fashion Runway Show 2026

Global Economic Times
korocamia@naver.com
CEO : LEE YEON-SIL
Publisher : KO YONG-CHUL
Registration number : Seoul, A55681
Registration Date : 2024-10-24
Youth Protection Manager: KO YONG-CHUL
Singapore Headquarters
5A Woodlands Road #11-34 The Tennery. S'677728
Korean Branch
Phone : +82(0)10 4724 5264
#304, 6 Nonhyeon-ro 111-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul
Copyright © Global Economic Times All Rights Reserved
  • 에이펙2025
  • APEC2025가이드북TV
  • 반달곰 프로젝트
Search
Category
  • All articles
  • Synthesis
  • World
  • Business
  • Industry
  • ICT
  • Distribution Economy
  • Well+Being
  • Travel
  • Eco-News
  • Education
  • Korean Wave News
  • Opinion
  • Arts&Culture
  • Sports
  • People & Life 
    • 전체
    • International Student Report
    • With Ambassador
  • Column 
    • 전체
    • Cho Kijo Column
    • Cherry Garden Story
    • Ko Yong-chul Column
    • Kim Seul-Ong Column
    • Lee Yeon-sil Column
  • Photo News
  • New Book Guide
  • Multicultural News
  • Jobs & Workers