For many, a nostalgic yearning still lingers in a corner of their memories—those days of capturing precious moments with Kodak film. Just over two decades ago, film cameras were the sole means of recording humanity's daily lives, and at the center of that colossal market stood an absolute titan: Kodak. Founded in 1888 by George Eastman, a former bank clerk in New York, Kodak entered the photography industry with a revolutionary slogan: "You press the button, we do the rest." Subsequently, Kodak became synonymous with film, growing into a world-class enterprise that dominated the global market.

However, Kodak’s empire, which seemed destined to last forever, did not endure for long. Paradoxically, the spark that led Kodak down the path of ruin first ignited from within. In 1975, Steven Sasson, a Kodak engineer, invented the world's very first digital camera. This was a flawless opportunity to preempt the market and lead the future. Yet, the management at the time was firmly convinced that it would take a considerable amount of time before filmless photography became the mainstream. Intoxicated by the immense profits and the formula for success that their decades-old, film-centered business model provided, they committed the grave error of ignoring and remaining complacent in the face of the massive wave of change approaching right before their eyes.

 
Trapped within the rigid framework of their conventional thinking, Kodak’s executives undervalued the worth of the new realm of filmless photography. Even if they recognized the necessity of change, they dealt with it complacently, believing there would still be ample time to prepare for the digital photography era. They had fallen into the "success trap," where the weight of past triumphs makes it increasingly difficult to embrace a new paradigm.

At that time, Kodak's revenue structure was deeply dysfunctional. Profits generated from the film photography industry accounted for the vast majority of the company's total sales. While this appeared robust on the surface, it was a highly vulnerable foundation that could collapse in an instant before the advent of digital technology. This serves as proof that a "one-well" strategy can actually turn into a fatal poison during a period of market paradigm shifts.

Belatedly sensing a crisis, Kodak poured massive amounts of capital into developing digital photography technology in an attempt to catch up. However, the core nature of the market had already shifted. Kodak fixated solely on the technology itself, overlooking the fundamental change in consumer desires—the yearning to share memories and information in real time through photographs. While they scrambled to adapt to hardware changes, they failed to read the evolution of the ecosystem centered on software and services.

Their business strategy, remaining stagnant in the analog mindset of the past, was ultimately met with the market's cold rejection. To make matters worse, with the emergence of the smartphone—a powerful disruptive innovation that maximized photo-sharing capabilities and enabled communication anytime, anywhere—Kodak's standing vanished in an instant. Consequently, the giant that had dominated the global photography market for over a century met a tragic end, filing for bankruptcy protection in 2012.

 
The case of Kodak's failure poses a heavy question to those of us living in today's rapidly changing era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. It starkly demonstrates how catastrophic the consequences can be when an organization relies solely on past glory and current stable revenue structures while resisting innovation driven by environmental changes. Failing to lead change means facing obsolescence—this is the ruthless law of the market.

Of course, it is difficult for digital photography to perfectly replace the unique analog sensibility and the weight of warm memories that film photography offers. It is the same reason why instant emails cannot substitute for the deep emotion and resonance delivered by a handwritten letter. No matter how digitalized the world becomes over time, analog heritages like film photography and handwritten letters will not disappear completely; they will remain by our side. The emotional joy and value they give us will undoubtedly remain cherished.

However, what we must guard against is not the analog sensibility itself, but rather a rigid attitude that rejects change. While we should cherish our sensibilities, in the realms of business and survival, we need an attitude of continuous self-disruption and innovation. The downfall of Kodak goes beyond the tragedy of a single enterprise; it serves as a powerful warning to all organizations and individuals who remain trapped in past successes and fail to see the future. The only thing that does not change is the fact that "everything changes."