GENEVA – A recent traffic violation in Switzerland has captured international attention, not for the speed of the car, but for the staggering amount of the fine. A wealthy French driver, whose name has not been released, was ordered to pay a penalty of up to 90,000 Swiss francs (approximately 155 million Korean won) after being caught driving 77 km/h in a 50 km/h zone in Lausanne. The case has put a global spotlight on Switzerland's unique and controversial "day fine" system, where traffic penalties are determined not by the offense alone but by the offender's financial status.

The incident, which took place in Vaud Canton, saw the driver, identified only as "Mr. A," get caught by a speed camera in the city of Lausanne. The local court's ruling was delivered on August 13, and it was quickly picked up by international news outlets. The initial fine of 10,000 Swiss francs (about 17 million Korean won) was a substantial sum in itself, but the real weight of the penalty came with a conditional fine of an additional 80,000 Swiss francs (about 137 million Korean won), which will be enforced if the driver commits another similar traffic offense within the next three years.

This two-tiered penalty is a direct result of Switzerland's commitment to a more equitable justice system. The country, along with nations like Germany, France, Austria, and several in Scandinavia, operates on a principle that a fixed fine, regardless of income, disproportionately affects low-income individuals while serving as little more than a minor inconvenience for the very wealthy.

The driver in this case is a prime example of why this system was enacted. According to a report by CNN, he is a French national who resides in Switzerland and is listed among the "300 richest people" in the country by the Swiss business magazine, Bilanz. He reportedly holds assets worth hundreds of millions of dollars. For someone of his wealth, a standard speeding ticket would have no deterrent effect, critics argue. This isn't his first brush with the law; he was reportedly fined a similar amount for a speeding offense eight years ago, suggesting that past penalties, even significant ones, have failed to change his driving behavior.

The day fine system was established in 2007 after a national referendum, which aimed to address the issue of wealthy individuals essentially being able to "buy their way out" of minor offenses like speeding or drunk driving. Under the revised criminal code, judges are empowered to assess a defendant's income, net worth, and other financial factors to determine a penalty that is both fair and impactful.

While the 90,000-franc fine is high, it is not the highest on record. That record belongs to another wealthy driver who was fined approximately 230,000 Swiss francs (about 400 million Korean won) in 2010 for speeding in a Ferrari in the canton of St. Gallen. This historical precedent further underscores Switzerland's resolve to ensure that justice is not a luxury reserved for the affluent.

Critics of the system argue that it creates a two-tiered legal framework, where different punishments are given for the same crime. However, proponents counter that the goal is not equal punishment, but equal deterrence. The Swiss system aims to make the penalty "hurt" just as much for a billionaire as it does for a working-class citizen, thereby ensuring that traffic laws are respected by all, regardless of their financial standing.

The case has ignited a wider debate on how justice should be applied. Should laws be blind to a person's financial situation, or should they be tailored to ensure that the penalty is meaningful and serves its intended purpose of deterrence? As more countries grapple with issues of income inequality, Switzerland's model provides a compelling case study on one approach to making the legal system more equitable. The question remains whether other nations will follow its lead in making fines a true reflection of both the crime and the offender's ability to pay.