Another personal information leak incident has occurred at the luxury brand Louis Vuitton. This follows a series of similar incidents at major luxury brands like Dior, Cartier, and Tiffany, intensifying criticism of foreign luxury companies' lax customer information management.

Louis Vuitton Korea officially acknowledged the data breach on its website on the 4th. Louis Vuitton stated, "An unauthorized third party temporarily accessed our system, resulting in the leak of some customer information." The incident occurred on June 8th, and the leaked information reportedly includes customer names and contact details. Fortunately, sensitive financial information such as passwords, credit card, and bank account details were not included, Louis Vuitton added. However, they explained that the leaked personal information items could vary by customer, leaving uncertainty about the extent of the damage.

This Louis Vuitton incident comes shortly after similar personal information leaks at Dior and Tiffany, both brands belonging to the Louis Vuitton Moët Hennessy (LVMH) group. Additionally, a series of leaks have been reported at French luxury brand Cartier, domestic luxury e-commerce platform Mustit, and foreign fashion brand Victoria's Secret, revealing widespread security vulnerabilities across the luxury industry.

Experts point out that the personal information of high-net-worth individuals who use luxury brands has become a prime target for hackers. Professor Emeritus Lim Jong-in of Korea University's Graduate School of Information Security analyzed, "If luxury user information is hacked and uploaded to the dark web, it trades at a much higher price than general consumer personal information. Given the very large scale of the Korean luxury market globally, hacking attempts aimed at financial gain appear to be frequent."

The repeated personal information leaks are also interpreted as a lack of security awareness among foreign luxury companies. Professor Park Chun-sik of Seoul Women's University's Department of Information Security strongly criticized, "These companies lack awareness of the importance of personal information protection, resulting in insufficient investment in security systems and specialized personnel." Indeed, many foreign luxury brands have legal entities in Korea but often rely on their headquarters' security policies, leading to criticism that they neglect security enhancements tailored to domestic characteristics.

This situation is amplifying consumer anxiety regarding luxury consumption. Such incidents, occurring when consumers provide their personal information to purchase high-priced products, can significantly erode consumer trust. The government and relevant authorities should thoroughly supervise foreign luxury brands' compliance with domestic personal information protection regulations and demand strong measures to prevent recurrence. Furthermore, companies should go beyond one-time apology notices and actively strive for practical security enhancements and victim protection.