On April 22nd, marking Earth Day, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) issued a stark warning about the perilous conditions faced by journalists reporting on environmental issues globally. The organization highlighted a disturbing trend of obstruction, intimidation, censorship, and even murder targeting those who seek to shed light on critical environmental challenges. In a call to action ahead of the 30th United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30) scheduled for November, RSF urged nations to ensure the safety and protection of environmental journalists.

According to RSF's grim statistics, at least 30 journalists have lost their lives since 2015 while investigating environmental concerns. The dangers faced by these truth-seekers span continents and encompass a wide range of threats. In Cambodia, Chhoeung Chheng was fatally shot in 2024 while reporting on illegal logging activities, a crime that underscores the deadly risks associated with exposing environmental malfeasance. The Philippines witnessed the murder of Cresencio Bunduquin in 2023; he was investigating an oil spill from a tanker suspected of operating with falsified permits, highlighting the nexus between environmental damage and potential corruption. The disappearance of Dom Phillips, a journalist specializing in deforestation in the Amazon, along with his guide in 2022, further brought international attention to the extreme vulnerabilities faced by those reporting in ecologically sensitive and often lawless regions.

RSF's analysis reveals a disturbing geographical concentration of violence against environmental journalists. Approximately 90% of the documented killings have occurred in countries such as India, Cambodia, the Philippines, and Indonesia. The situation in India is particularly alarming, with nearly half of the 28 journalists murdered during Narendra Modi's decade in power having reported on issues related to land acquisition and industrial mining projects. These cases illustrate how economic interests often clash violently with the public's right to know about environmental impacts.

Beyond lethal violence, environmental journalists frequently encounter other severe forms of persecution. Nargiz Absalamova in Azerbaijan was arrested in 2023 on fabricated "foreign currency smuggling" charges while covering protests by residents affected by toxic waste from an open-pit gold mine. Her colleague, Elmaddin Shamilzade, endured torture and threats of rape by police seeking to extract his phone's unlock code to delete incriminating photos taken at the protest site. In India, Rupesh Kumar Singh has been detained since July 2022 after exposing a report on an industrial pollution-related health disaster, demonstrating the lengths to which authorities and vested interests will go to suppress critical environmental information. Even in Ghana, journalists investigating illegal mining faced attacks in February despite being under police escort, indicating the pervasive nature of the threats. RSF specifically documented a staggering 85 cases of press freedom violations in the Brazilian Amazon between June 30, 2022, and July 2024, a region where environmental destruction is rampant and often linked to powerful criminal networks.

RSF's findings underscore a worrying correlation between resource extraction and the suppression of press freedom. The organization points out that approximately two-thirds of the world's natural resources are extracted in countries where press freedom is severely compromised. This nexus suggests that governments and corporations involved in resource exploitation often operate with a lack of transparency and actively seek to silence critical reporting on their environmental impact. The pursuit of economic gain, therefore, frequently comes at the cost of environmental accountability and the safety of those who dare to scrutinize it.

The organization also raised concerns about the proliferation of misinformation regarding climate change, warning that such disinformation poses a "global disaster," severely undermining the quality of public discourse and hindering effective climate action. In an era where accurate and reliable information is crucial for addressing the climate crisis, the deliberate spread of false or misleading narratives can have devastating consequences. By eroding public trust in scientific consensus and downplaying the urgency of the situation, misinformation obstructs the implementation of necessary policies and individual actions to mitigate climate change.

RSF emphasized that the safety of journalists covering environmental issues is not merely a matter of press freedom but a fundamental pillar of effective climate change response. Ensuring the protection of these journalists is essential for guaranteeing access to credible and independent information, which is vital for public awareness, informed decision-making, and holding powerful actors accountable for their environmental stewardship. Without a free and safe press capable of investigating and reporting on environmental challenges, the fight against climate change and other environmental threats will be severely hampered.

In light of these alarming trends, RSF's call for greater protection for environmental journalists ahead of COP30 carries significant weight. The organization urges governments worldwide to take concrete steps to ensure the safety of journalists, investigate attacks and threats against them, and foster an environment where they can report freely and without fear of reprisal. As the world grapples with the escalating climate crisis and other pressing environmental issues, the role of a free and independent press in providing crucial information and holding power to account has never been more critical. The international community must heed RSF's warning and act decisively to protect those who risk their lives to bring vital environmental information to light. The safety of environmental journalists is inextricably linked to the health of our planet and the future of informed public discourse on environmental challenges.