SEOUL – A recent exploration of the Dong-A Ilbo archives has unearthed a fascinating relic of Korea's past: a photograph from February 16, 1925, depicting a spirited orator addressing a crowd at the National Joseon Oratory Contest. This image, however, raises a poignant question: What has become of the once-prominent tradition of public speaking in Korea?

A Fading Echo

A search within the Dong-A Ilbo's database reveals a stark decline in images related to oratory. Since the 1960s, a mere 113 photos featuring the subject have been cataloged, with even fewer showcasing Korean speakers. This scarcity is surprising, considering the prevalence of oratory contests in the collective memory of those who attended school in the 1970s and 80s.

The reasons behind this decline are multifaceted. It's possible that oratory events simply weren't deemed newsworthy. However, a more fundamental shift seems to have occurred: the gradual disappearance of oratory contests themselves. Unlike previous generations, today's students rarely have the opportunity to participate in such events, with the once-common English oratory contests now relegated to occasional advertisements.

Shifting Societal Values

In the past, during times of hardship and oppression, the role of the "speaker" was vital. These individuals served as rallying points, inspiring and galvanizing communities. However, contemporary Korean society appears to have embraced a different set of values. There's a tacit understanding that individual and collective progress is best achieved through specialized skills and expertise, rather than impassioned rhetoric. Politics, it seems, has been entrusted to elected officials and subject matter experts.

The Resurgence of Rhetoric

Yet, recent events have thrust us into a world saturated with "oratory." The ongoing political turmoil, sparked by President Yoon Suk-yeol's controversial remarks on 계엄령 (martial law), has ignited a firestorm of debate. The impeachment proceedings and constitutional court hearings have become a spectacle, with legal jargon and impassioned arguments dominating the public discourse. YouTube channels are flooded with live streams, commentary, and partisan interpretations. The very halls of justice and protest sites echo with vitriolic language that is difficult to repeat.

The high-pitched tones, carefully chosen words, and deliberate repetition employed by these speakers bear a striking resemblance to the oratory contests of yesteryear. We live in an era where eloquent individuals wield immense power, some profiting handsomely from their verbal prowess, others sacrificing financial gain for ideological pursuits. There are even those who now recant their past pronouncements.

A Call for Restraint

This resurgence of rhetoric raises concerns. Individuals tend to reflect the spirit of their times. What kind of future awaits us if we are constantly bombarded by polarized voices and belligerent language that demonizes opponents?

Amidst the deluge of countless videos over the past two months, one particular instance of "oratory" stands out: Prime Minister Han Duck-soo's address at the first hearing of the impeachment trial on February 19, 2025.

His delivery was measured, devoid of heightened tones or repetitive emphasis. In a South Korea where politics has failed to uphold the values of compromise and sacrifice, where internal conflicts have spilled over into public squares and political platforms, someone must speak with reason and composure.

The Enduring Power of Words

Words have the power to shape our world. They can inspire, incite, and ultimately define who we are as a society. As we navigate this era of heightened rhetoric, let us remember the lessons of the past and strive for a future where reasoned discourse prevails over impassioned oratory.