(C) Toolsmart AI

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes deeply integrated into the fabric of higher education, South Korean universities are facing a pivotal challenge: balancing technological innovation with academic integrity. Recent incidents of AI-assisted cheating have spurred a wave of "AI Ethical Charters" and rigorous usage guidelines across campuses, marking a significant shift toward a more regulated digital academic environment.

The Rise of the "AI Shortcut"
The urgency follows several high-profile incidents of academic dishonesty. Last month, Yonsei University reported multiple cases of students using AI to generate answers during a non-face-to-face midterm for a course ironically titled "Natural Language Processing and ChatGPT." Similarly, Seoul National University detected unauthorized AI usage in a statistics lab exam in October.

Data provided by Representative Kang Kyung-sook of the Rebuilding Korea Party reveals that 49 universities reported 224 cases of cheating over the past five years, with Generative AI specifically cited in several recent instances. Despite these growing pains, a survey by the Korean Council for University Education (KCUE) indicates that 77.1% of domestic universities still lack concrete policies regarding the use of Generative AI in research and learning.

Establishing the "Three-Tier" Framework
In response, leading institutions are now stepping up to fill this policy vacuum. Jeonbuk National University (JBNU) announced a comprehensive overhaul of its "Generative AI Teaching and Learning Guidelines" on December 24.

The cornerstone of JBNU’s new policy is a mandatory three-tier classification system:

Strict Prohibition: AI use is entirely banned.
Partial Allowance: AI can be used for brainstorming or structural assistance.
Full Allowance: Active integration of AI tools is encouraged.

Faculty members are now required to specify the permitted level of AI usage in their syllabi and clarify what constitutes misconduct before assignments begin. "While AI can significantly enhance learning experiences, it can cause severe side effects if used without clear standards," stated Oh Sang-wook, Dean of Academic Affairs at JBNU.

Professional and Ethical Training
The movement is not limited to four-year research universities. Hanyang Women’s University recently became the first vocational college in Korea to proclaim an "AI Ethics Charter." Their "10 Commandments of AI Ethics" emphasize human dignity, privacy protection, and the transparent disclosure of AI-generated sources. Starting next year, the university will mandate an "AI Literacy and Ethics" course for all students to ensure ethical awareness is built into the curriculum.

Baehwa Women’s University has also taken a proactive stance by launching an official AI Ethics Committee. This body oversees policy implementation and reviews ethical dilemmas arising from AI use. Like JBNU, Baehwa requires all instructors to label their courses based on AI permissible levels (Prohibited, Partial, or Full).

The Path Forward: Literacy Over Prohibition
Experts emphasize that the goal is not to stifle technology but to foster a culture of "Responsible AI." Yoon Tae-bok, chair of the AI/DX division of the specialized college innovation council, suggested that guidelines must be accessible and constantly reinforced through workshops and core curricula.

"AI is already a part of daily life," noted Na Se-ri, President of Hanyang Women's University. "It must be utilized as a tool that assists human judgment, not replaces it."

To ensure these policies are more than just words on paper, universities are turning to visual communication. Jeonbuk National University, for instance, has released "Card News" (infographics) and digital handbooks via Learning Management Systems (LMS) to ensure students and faculty are constantly reminded of their ethical obligations.

As the 2026 academic year approaches, the "AI Ethics" movement is expected to expand nationwide, setting a new standard for how the global academic community handles the double-edged sword of artificial intelligence.