The Hague, Netherlands – The Italian government argued before the European Union's highest court on Tuesday that its plan to transfer migrants to asylum processing centers in Albania is fully compliant with EU and international human rights law.

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) is expediting two cases brought by Bangladeshi nationals whose asylum applications were rejected following single remote hearings from a detention facility in Albania. The two men appealed the decision to a court in Rome, which then sought clarification from the Luxembourg-based ECJ regarding EU law.

Background of the Agreement

In 2023, Italy and Albania forged an agreement to accommodate up to 3,000 male migrants while their asylum claims are processed. The arrangement involves two purpose-built detention centers, funded by Rome at a cost of 670 million euros ($730 million) over five years. These facilities operate under Italian jurisdiction, with Albanian guards providing external security.

The two Bangladeshi men were among the first group of migrants to arrive in Albania in October. However, the facilities have remained largely vacant due to ongoing legal challenges, despite Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's government's commitment to activating the centers.

Legal Arguments and Concerns

Lawyers representing the men, whose identities are withheld for security reasons, contend that Albania does not meet the criteria of a "safe third country" as mandated by EU law. They argue that the process violates their fundamental rights.

"It is not possible to designate a third country as safe if certain categories of people cannot be considered safe in that country," stated lawyer Dario Belluccio before the judges, highlighting the lack of protection for LGBTQ+ individuals in Albania.

Albania does not legally recognize same-sex marriage, and the United Nations has documented instances of discrimination and violence against LGBTQ+ individuals in the country.

Italy's Defense

"The condition of safety does not have to be fulfilled equally for all individuals," countered Lorenzo D'Ascia, representing the Italian state, in his address to the court.

Under the agreement, migrants retain their right to seek asylum in Italy under EU and international law. The Italian government asserts that their rights will be fully protected while they are on Albanian soil.

Looking Ahead

The ECJ's advocate general is scheduled to provide non-binding legal advice on the case in April, with a final ruling expected before the summer. This decision will have significant implications for Italy's migration policy and the broader application of EU asylum law.

Key Issues at Stake:

"Safe Third Country" Concept: The case scrutinizes the interpretation and application of the "safe third country" principle in EU asylum law.
Fundamental Rights: It addresses the protection of fundamental rights, particularly for vulnerable groups like LGBTQ+ individuals, in the context of international agreements.
Externalization of Asylum Processing: The agreement represents a form of externalization of asylum processing, raising questions about the extraterritorial application of EU law.

This case is being watched closely by human rights organizations, legal experts, and policymakers across Europe, as it has the potential to reshape the landscape of migration management within the EU.